Beta aicost.ai cost engines are in beta. Estimates only. See Terms.
MSP Economics · AICost.ai cost decision engine

🚀 How much new AI MRR is sitting in your client base?

The AI revenue gap: 48% of clients ask for AI, 13% of MSPs earn recurring AI revenue from it*. Ten questions. You get a readiness score, the gaps that block a safe launch (metering, governance, pricing, skills), a 5-step launch path, and the new AI MRR already inside your client base — per client and in total.

Grounded typical ranges, sourced* Decision-first — a verdict and a next step MCP engine: aicost.msp-ai-readiness
Readiness score (/100)
38
What this calculator does

The AI revenue gap: 48% of clients ask for AI, 13% of MSPs earn recurring AI revenue from it*. Ten questions. You get a readiness score, the gaps that block a safe launch (metering, governance, pricing, skills), a 5-step launch path, and the new AI MRR already inside your client base — per client and in total.

Every number recomputes live; the same logic answers on the web, in the PDF one-pager, and to AI agents over MCP — identical results on every surface.

Why use it

New to this calculator? Start with the ⚡ Playground — a few sliders, instant ballpark. Then switch to the 🧮 Calculator for your exact number.

Two ways to use this: visualize in the Playground, then get your number in the Calculator.

Playground A quick, visual way to see which factors move your result the most. Open the playground → Calculator Enter your real workload for a precise result you can apply to your own usage. Go to the calculator →
⚡ AI Services Readiness Score Playground
The 4 factors that move this the most — drag and watch the decision change.
Readiness score (/100)
38 NEARLY READY
→ PILOT WITH 3 CLIENTS
48 %
750 $
0
1
Try a scenario: 📄 Print one-pager ✉ Email me this

AI Services Readiness Score — your exact numbers

Enter your shop's numbers. Everything recomputes live.
📊 Not sure of a value? Fields with a ▾ Typical pill offer broad industry ballparks (sourced typical ranges) so you can move forward now — your result gets more accurate as you replace them with your own measured numbers. Values marked * are rough estimates.
Managed-services client count.
2026 surveys put this near 48%*.
Per-client AI usage visibility + budgets.
Published policy + data-risk tiers.
How AI services are priced today.
Managed AI / Copilot value service fee.
Across the whole base.
What you bill for AI today.
Delivery + cost-reporting capability.
For sizing the service.
Verdict
NEARLY READY

Readiness 38/100 with 11 clients already asking about AI.

Readiness score (/100)
38
Clients already asking
11
New AI MRR (conservative)
$1,980
New AI MRR (aggressive)
$3,960
Recurring AI revenue / yr (conservative)
$23,760
Recurring AI revenue / yr (aggressive)
$47,520
Top gap to close
Usage metering & budgets per client
What to do
PILOT WITH 3 CLIENTS

Method memo

Readiness 38/100. 11 of 22 clients (48%) are asking about AI. At $750/client/mo and 25–50% capture, the unsold opportunity is new AI MRR of $1,980–$3,960/mo ($23,760–$47,520/yr*). Top gap: Usage metering & budgets per client.

Questions to pressure-test with

  1. Which three clients would pilot a paid AI service this quarter?
  2. What happens today when a client’s AI usage doubles mid-month?
  3. Who on the team owns AI cost reporting for QBRs?

Assumptions

  • 48%/13% demand-revenue gap per Kaseya 2026 MSP survey*.
  • ARR band assumes 25–50% capture of asking clients at your target fee; replace with your pipeline.
  • Scores weight metering + governance heaviest: they are what make AI services provable and safe to sell.

Values marked * are analyst estimates rather than vendor-verified data.

📖 Data sources & methodology 150 text models · 9 embeddings · 40 vision · 55 audio · 8 vector DBs across 10 vendor pages · last verified 2026-09-13

Methodology

  • All prices are USD per 1 million tokens, current as of 2026-09-13.
  • Vendor-published values have no mark. Inferred/extrapolated values are marked with * and listed below.
  • Batch API discounts are 50% off standard rates across providers that offer Batch mode.
  • Prompt caching discounts vary by provider (typically 80-90% off cached input tokens).
  • Regional data-residency surcharges (Anthropic 1.1x, OpenAI 1.1x, Google regional tiers) are NOT included in base rates.
  • Long-context pricing tiers apply when input exceeds model threshold.
  • Embedding prices are input-only (no output tokens generated).

Primary sources

Last-verified date is the most recent successful daily snapshot (aicost_pricing_snapshots) or, when no snapshot exists yet, the latest successful crawler run (aicost_crawler_runs). 10 of 10 vendors are currently verified. Aggregator services (TokenCost, AI Pricing Guru, etc.) are not listed.

Anthropic
2026-09-13
https://www.anthropic.com/pricing
Daily snapshot since Sep 2023 · 677 days captured
Anthropic Docs
2026-09-13
https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing
Daily snapshot since Sep 2023 · 677 days captured
OpenAI
2026-09-13
https://openai.com/api/pricing/
Daily snapshot since Sep 2023 · 678 days captured
Google AI
2026-09-13
https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing
Daily snapshot since Dec 2023 · 653 days captured
Google Vertex
2026-09-13
https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing
Daily snapshot since Dec 2023 · 653 days captured
DeepSeek
2026-09-13
https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing
Daily snapshot since May 2024 · 592 days captured
xAI
2026-09-13
https://x.ai/api
Daily snapshot since Nov 2024 · 510 days captured
Mistral
2026-09-13
https://mistral.ai/pricing
Daily snapshot since Dec 2023 · 651 days captured
Cohere
2026-09-13
https://cohere.com/pricing
Daily snapshot since Sep 2023 · 677 days captured

Inferred values (marked with * in calculator tables)

Derived from industry conventions, not directly published by the vendor. Typical conventions: cached input = 10% of base (90% off), Batch API = 50% of base (50% off).

Vendor / Model Field Why it’s inferred
Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.6 cachedInput Derived at 10% of input rate — Anthropic publishes 90% cache-hit discount on this tier.
Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.5 cachedInput Derived at 10% of input rate; same 90% cache-hit convention as Sonnet 4.6.
Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.5 batchInput Derived at 50% of standard input — Anthropic documents uniform 50% Batch discount.
Anthropic — Claude Sonnet 4.5 batchOutput Derived at 50% of standard output — Anthropic documents uniform 50% Batch discount.
Anthropic — Claude Haiku 4.5 cachedInput Derived at 10% of input rate — Anthropic 90% cache-hit discount convention.
OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Mini cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI documents automatic 90% discount on cache hits across GPT-5.x tier.
OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Nano cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI 90% cache-hit convention.
OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Nano batchInput Derived at 50% of input — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount.
OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Nano batchOutput Derived at 50% of output — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount.
OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Pro cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI 90% cache-hit convention.
OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Pro batchInput Derived at 50% of input — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount.
OpenAI — GPT-5.4 Pro batchOutput Derived at 50% of output — OpenAI Batch API uniform 50% discount.
OpenAI — GPT-5.2 cachedInput Derived at 10% of input; no residency uplift.
OpenAI — GPT-5.2 batchInput Derived at 50% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5.2 batchOutput Derived at 50% of output.
OpenAI — GPT-5 cachedInput Derived at 10% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5 batchInput Derived at 50% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5 batchOutput Derived at 50% of output.
OpenAI — GPT-5.5 Pro cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — OpenAI does not publish a cached rate for *-pro models; using the family convention.
OpenAI — GPT-5.5 Pro batchInput Derived at 50% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5.5 Pro batchOutput Derived at 50% of output.
OpenAI — GPT-5.2 Pro cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — pro-tier convention.
OpenAI — GPT-5.2 Pro batchInput Derived at 50% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5.2 Pro batchOutput Derived at 50% of output.
OpenAI — GPT-5.1 batchInput Derived at 50% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5.1 batchOutput Derived at 50% of output.
OpenAI — GPT-5 Pro batchInput Derived at 50% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5 Pro batchOutput Derived at 50% of output.
OpenAI — GPT-5 Nano cachedInput Derived at 10% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5 Nano batchInput Derived at 50% of input.
OpenAI — GPT-5 Nano batchOutput Derived at 50% of output.
Google — Gemini 3 Flash cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — Google caching discount convention ~90%.
Google — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — Google caching convention.
Google — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite batchInput Derived at 50% of input — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount.
Google — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite batchOutput Derived at 50% of output — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount.
Google — Gemini 2.5 Pro cachedInput Derived at 10% of input.
Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash cachedInput Derived at 10% of input.
Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite cachedInput Derived at 10% of input — Google caching convention.
Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite batchInput Derived at 50% of input — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount.
Google — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite batchOutput Derived at 50% of output — Google Batch API uniform 50% discount.
xAI — Grok 4 (legacy) cachedInput Extrapolated at 25% of base.

Pricing is cross-verified against the LiteLLM community registry when available. Daily snapshots are kept in aicost_pricing_snapshots; every change is logged to aicost_price_changelog with old & new values for full audit trail. Read the full methodology →